| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
| Date: | 2023-10-24 04:21:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+YZP3j1H4ChhzSR23k6MPryW-cgGstyvqbek2CMJoHRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 5:41 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 8:51 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 9. IMO, binary_upgrade_logical_replication_slot_has_caught_up seems
> better, meaningful and consistent despite a bit long than just
> binary_upgrade_slot_has_caught_up.
>
I think logical_replication is specific to our pub-sub model but we
can have manually created slots as well. So, it would be better to
name it as binary_upgrade_logical_slot_has_caught_up().
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2023-10-24 04:25:12 | Re: BUG #17540: Prepared statement: PG switches to a generic query plan which is consistently much slower |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-10-24 04:16:37 | Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |