Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2020-02-01 05:35:42
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+Y=3vwuunhYvJCop2MKi4R4LPx781Cgt+yT5zWNLFxMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:10 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Other comments look fine to me so I will reply to them along with the
> next version of the patch.
>

This still needs more work, so I have moved this to the next CF.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-02-01 05:42:00 Re: [PATCH] Fix Proposal - Deadlock Issue in Single User Mode When IO Failure Occurs
Previous Message David Steele 2020-02-01 05:31:40 Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI.