From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch for nodeIncrementalSort comment correction. |
Date: | 2020-07-20 01:46:08 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+Xtjz-7eTE9TXwLHUzJdzRxeT0mRBUyF1k-GhpejNrmw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 7:25 PM James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, July 18, 2020, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> One of the comments needs correction "sorting all tuples in the the
>> dataset" should have been "sorting all tuples in the dataset".
>> The Attached patch has the changes for the same.
>>
>
>
> Thanks for fixing this. Looks correct to me.
>
Yeah, looks like a typo will push in some time.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-07-20 02:57:39 | Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom? |
Previous Message | Greg Nancarrow | 2020-07-20 01:15:02 | Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority |