| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests |
| Date: | 2022-08-03 04:51:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+X_R5=YhRmpREkS1i9z9KuxroLi-0dkh+1sPduibzAiw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 12:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:08 PM shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> > <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I've attached updated patches that incorporated the above comments as
> > well as the comment from Amit.
> >
> > BTW regarding 0001 patch to remove the duplicated wait, should we
> > backpatch to v15?
> >
>
> I think it is good to clean this test case even for PG15 even though
> there is no major harm in keeping it. I'll push this early next week
> by Tuesday unless someone thinks otherwise.
>
Pushed this one and now I'll look at your other patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-08-03 04:52:07 | Re: Functions 'is_publishable_class' and 'is_publishable_relation' should stay together. |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-08-03 04:06:25 | Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns |