From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | bpd0018(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re[2]: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData |
Date: | 2018-09-25 11:55:27 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+VR4bx+VQMyCT9TQzwb_h5c9e3JrYwsAxU-5OGHEGwxw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:51 AM Bradley DeJong <bpd0018(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2018-09-22, Amit Kapila wrote ...
> > ... duplicate the same information in different words at three
> different places ...
>
> I count 7 different places. In the protocol docs, there is the old
> mention in the "Summary of Changes since Protocol 2.0" section
>
Below text is present in the section quoted by you:
The special <quote><literal>\.</literal></quote> last line is not
needed anymore, and is not sent during <command>COPY OUT</command>.
(It is still recognized as a terminator during <command>COPY
IN</command>, but its use is deprecated and will eventually be
removed.)
This email started with the need to mention this in protocol.sgml and
it is already present although at a different place than the place at
which it is proposed. Personally, I don't see the need to add it to
more places. Does anybody else have any opinion on this matter?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Surafel Temesgen | 2018-09-25 12:07:17 | Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option |
Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2018-09-25 11:46:22 | Re: Collation versioning |