From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in parallel worker (ExecInitSubPlan) |
Date: | 2016-05-13 04:13:37 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+K2Ufvpzutj7CsL1SPNyTEnDOY24=vbB6UmkRtNQeODA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> Target list for a relation, you mean? See relation.h:
> >>
> >> * reltarget - Default Path output tlist for this rel; normally
contains
> >> * Var and PlaceHolderVar nodes for the values we need
to
> >> * output from this relation.
> >> * List is in no particular order, but all rels of an
> >> * appendrel set must use corresponding orders.
> >> * NOTE: in an appendrel child relation, may contain
> >> * arbitrary expressions pulled up from a subquery!
>
> > Err, wow. That makes my head hurt. Can you explain why this case
> > only arises for appendrel children, and not for plain rels?
>
> Well, plain rels only output Vars ;-)
>
Does this mean that base rels can't contain PlaceHolderVars? Isn't it
possible in below code:
query_planner()
{
..
/*
* Now distribute "placeholders" to base rels as needed. This has to be
* done after join removal because removal could change whether a
* placeholder is evaluatable at a base rel.
*/
add_placeholders_to_base_rels(root);
..
}
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-05-13 05:01:54 | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in parallel worker (ExecInitSubPlan) |
Previous Message | Sridhar N Bamandlapally | 2016-05-13 03:15:46 | Re: [GENERAL] NULL concatenation |