Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 9:37 PM David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 2:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:18 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>>
>> > > The view name could be pg_stat_subscription_lrep,
>> > > pg_stat_logical_replication, or something on those lines.
>> >
>> > pg_stat_subscription_stats :)
>> >
>>
>> Having *stat* two times in the name sounds slightly odd to me but let
>> us see what others think. One more option could be
>> pg_stat_subscription_replication.
>>
>
> Agreed.
>
> pg_stat_subscription_activity
>
> We already have pg_stat_activity (which may be an argument against the suggestion...)
>

I don't know if that can be an argument against it but one can imagine
that we record other subscription changes like (change of
publications, etc.). I personally feel it may be better to add
'_replication' in some way like pg_stat_sub_replication_activity but I
am fine either way.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.