| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge |
| Date: | 2020-07-23 10:14:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+GYBCTZ-P9xVUg6mSvM7umKf5O8ZGXTJA85myS5BYe=Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 9:05 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
<jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:29:00 +0530
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > BTW, can you please test if the problem exist in back-branches, and does
> > your change fix it there as well?
>
> Gather Merge appears in v10, but I haven't been able to produce a plan using it.
>
I am able to do it for v10. I think you can try by "set
enable_hashagg = off;" and following all other steps mentioned in your
email? Attached, please find the patch for v10 with a modified commit
message. I will do it for other versions as well if you are fine with
it?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Fix-buffer-usage-stats-for-nodes-above-Gather-Merge.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2020-07-23 10:29:09 | Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge |
| Previous Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2020-07-23 09:07:49 | Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge |