From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Hsu, John" <hsuchen(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ERROR: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn record |
Date: | 2020-02-13 08:45:13 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+FFv6XPVHGh0ZeZjM3vT-o2TH==EHmDAHpja6m4Vxaag@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 1:42 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Attached is a patch where I have modified the comments and slightly
> > edited the commit message. This patch was not getting applied in v11
> > and branches lower than that, so I prepared a patch for those branches
> > as well. I have tested this patch till 9.5 and it works as intended.
> >
> > Can you also once check the patch and verify it in back-branches?
>
> I have checked the patch and it looks fine to me. I have also tested
> it on the back branches and it works fine.
>
Thanks, I am planning to commit this next week sometime (on Wednesday
19-Feb) to let others review or share their opinion.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2020-02-13 14:35:20 | BUG #16257: 12.2 rpm packages size increase vs 12.1 |
Previous Message | Valentin Kovalenko | 2020-02-13 07:52:10 | Re: BUG #16256: Checking deferred FK constraints when updating PK is ordrs of magnitude slower than when updating FK |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-02-13 08:56:38 | backend type in log_line_prefix? |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2020-02-13 08:15:02 | Re: Identifying user-created objects |