From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Track in pg_replication_slots the reason why slots conflict? |
Date: | 2024-01-02 05:05:59 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+3CDHGXyaQhBdj0X=hyDtZWOSrm+X6dsHsLOt+0Dt-cQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 5:24 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Please ignore the previous patch and PFA new v4 (v4_2). The only
> change from the earlier v4 is the subject correction in commit msg.
>
The patch looks good to me. I have slightly changed one of the
descriptions in the docs and also modified the commit message a bit. I
will push this after two days unless there are any more
comments/suggestions.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-0001-Track-conflict_reason-in-pg_replication_slots.patch | application/octet-stream | 13.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhang Mingli | 2024-01-02 05:12:22 | Re: Minor cleanup for search path cache |
Previous Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-01-02 05:00:00 | Re: Random pg_upgrade test failure on drongo |