From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |
Date: | 2021-09-14 04:28:01 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+=FRnrZZDa1VMjkn2Dpw011=Q8djdSMkiBSOS9s2J0uw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:11 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 8:43 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the changes, the suggested changes make the parsing code
> > simpler. I have merged the changes to the main patch. Attached v27
> > patch has the changes for the same.
> >
>
> +pubobj_name: ColId { $$ = list_make1(makeString($1)); }
> + | ColId indirection { $$ = lcons(makeString($1), $2); }
> ;
>
> I think "ColId indirection" should handle catalog and schema name as
> we are doing in qualified_name. See attached (this can be applied atop
> v27-0002). The one other improvement we can do here is to extract the
> common code from qualified_name (especially for "ColId indirection")
> and pubobj_name. What do you think?
>
One more suggestion for changes in gram.y:
@@ -12430,7 +12476,14 @@ relation_expr:
$$->inh = true;
$$->alias = NULL;
}
- | qualified_name '*'
+ | special_relation_expr
+ {
+ $$ = $1;
+ }
+ ;
+
+special_relation_expr:
+ qualified_name '*'
I am not sure if naming the above rule as special_relation_expr is a
good idea. Can we name it as extended_relation_expr?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com | 2021-09-14 04:42:14 | RE: Allow escape in application_name |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-09-14 04:02:49 | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |