| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Muhammad Ikram <mmikram(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17 |
| Date: | 2024-06-22 09:47:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1++Fw11dDTU7jfdhc0BGpdYmh6Q5HcCXM6XJp_hpuJ-Gw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 1:49 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 03:50:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>>> Allow specification of physical standbys that must be synchronized
> >>>>> before they are visible to subscribers (Hou Zhijie, Shveta Malik)
> >
> > it seems like the name ought to have some connection to
> > synchronization. Perhaps something like "synchronized_standby_slots"?
>
> IMHO that might be a bit too close to synchronous_standby_names.
>
Right, but better than the current one. The other possibility could be
wait_for_standby_slots.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robins Tharakan | 2024-06-22 11:52:51 | Re: recoveryCheck/008_fsm_truncation is failing on dodo in v14- (due to slow fsync?) |
| Previous Message | Joel Jacobson | 2024-06-22 09:44:02 | Re: Add pg_get_acl() function get the ACL for a database object |