Re: storing an explicit nonce

From: Neil Chen <carpenter(dot)nail(dot)cz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Kincaid <tomjohnkincaid(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: storing an explicit nonce
Date: 2021-05-28 06:16:54
Message-ID: CAA3qoJks3eA6YAUehipf5fF5j66WAviMGq+vSVduJxpeOdkczw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:12 PM Neil Chen <carpenter(dot)nail(dot)cz(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

>
> When the checksums are disabled, we can use these unused checksum values
> as a counter to make sure we have different nonce even if we don't write
> the new WAL record.
>
>
Ah, well, I think I've figured it out for myself. In this way, we can't
protect against torn pages...

--
There is no royal road to learning.
HighGo Software Co.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-05-28 06:25:38 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Neil Chen 2021-05-28 06:12:53 Re: storing an explicit nonce