Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add pg_audit, an auditing extension

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add pg_audit, an auditing extension
Date: 2015-11-18 13:54:47
Message-ID: CAA-aLv7dVgXTC51oUBCbMZa48X-51H6YzkrvSgH2Wu82ysoZug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 10 June 2015 at 14:41, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 03:54:59PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
>> I've certainly had quite the experience as a first-time contributor
>> working on this patch. Perhaps I bit off more than I should have and I
>> definitely managed to ruffle a few feathers along the way. I learned a
>> lot about how the community works, both the good and the bad. Fear not,
>> though, I'm not so easily discouraged and you'll definitely be hearing
>> more from me.
>
> Glad to hear it.
>
>> The stated purpose of contrib is: "include porting tools, analysis
>> utilities, and plug-in features that are not part of the core PostgreSQL
>> system, mainly because they address a limited audience or are too
>> experimental to be part of the main source tree. This does not preclude
>> their usefulness."
>>
>> Perhaps we should consider modifying that language, because from my
>> perspective pg_audit fit the description perfectly.
>
> "What is contrib?" attracts enduring controversy; see recent thread "RFC:
> Remove contrib entirely" for the latest episode. However that discussion
> concludes, that documentation passage is not too helpful as a guide to
> predicting contrib patch reception. (Most recent contrib additions had an
> obvious analogy to an existing module, sidestepping the question.)

Is pg_audit being resubmitted for 9.6 at all?

Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-11-18 17:36:27 pgsql: Avoid aggregating worker instrumentation multiple times.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-11-18 13:28:52 pgsql: Fix dumb bug in tqueue.c

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-11-18 14:35:09 Re: Feature or bug: getting "Inf"::timestamp[tz] by "regular" value
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-11-18 13:09:49 Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review