From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add pg_audit, an auditing extension |
Date: | 2015-11-18 13:54:47 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv7dVgXTC51oUBCbMZa48X-51H6YzkrvSgH2Wu82ysoZug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 10 June 2015 at 14:41, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 03:54:59PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
>> I've certainly had quite the experience as a first-time contributor
>> working on this patch. Perhaps I bit off more than I should have and I
>> definitely managed to ruffle a few feathers along the way. I learned a
>> lot about how the community works, both the good and the bad. Fear not,
>> though, I'm not so easily discouraged and you'll definitely be hearing
>> more from me.
>
> Glad to hear it.
>
>> The stated purpose of contrib is: "include porting tools, analysis
>> utilities, and plug-in features that are not part of the core PostgreSQL
>> system, mainly because they address a limited audience or are too
>> experimental to be part of the main source tree. This does not preclude
>> their usefulness."
>>
>> Perhaps we should consider modifying that language, because from my
>> perspective pg_audit fit the description perfectly.
>
> "What is contrib?" attracts enduring controversy; see recent thread "RFC:
> Remove contrib entirely" for the latest episode. However that discussion
> concludes, that documentation passage is not too helpful as a guide to
> predicting contrib patch reception. (Most recent contrib additions had an
> obvious analogy to an existing module, sidestepping the question.)
Is pg_audit being resubmitted for 9.6 at all?
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-18 17:36:27 | pgsql: Avoid aggregating worker instrumentation multiple times. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-18 13:28:52 | pgsql: Fix dumb bug in tqueue.c |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-18 14:35:09 | Re: Feature or bug: getting "Inf"::timestamp[tz] by "regular" value |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-11-18 13:09:49 | Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review |