From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: rc1 or beta4? |
Date: | 2011-08-17 16:16:46 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv7Xe-BdY662c_NLrw+tFDK-j_N8PRaPr-4vpSLXesNmSg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 August 2011 16:56, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> wrote:
> On 17/08/11 17:50, Thom Brown wrote:
> > On 17 August 2011 16:47, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 17/08/11 15:00, Dave Page wrote:
> >>> The current plan (or, the last one I recall) is to push another 9.1
> >>> release tomorrow, for Monday release. Are we going with beta4 or rc1?
> >>
> >> Sorry to butt in, but it would probably be good to include fixes for the
> >> two segfault plpython bugs[1] before wrapping up the release.
> >>
> >
> > It's not listed as a beta-blocker yet. I take it that it should?
>
> Oh, in the wiki? I don't know, it is a segfault-causing bug, but all I
> wanted was to draw some attention in case the people wrapping the
> release missed that thread.
>
It was my understanding that the only things which can prevent a new beta or
release candidate are listed on the wiki (
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Open_Items) There's only
one item on the list now, and I think even that has probably been fixed. If
it's not on there, I guess it hasn't yet been considered to be something
which can block a release. Since it's not even listed as a non-blocker
either, I don't think it's been reviewed in this context.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2011-08-17 16:31:14 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: In pg_upgrade, avoid dumping orphaned temporary tables. This ma |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2011-08-17 16:12:49 | Re: pgsql: In pg_upgrade, avoid dumping orphaned temporary tables. This ma |