Re: Changeset Extraction v7.5

On 8 February 2014 22:47, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Thom,
>
> On 2014-02-08 22:26:59 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
>> Got a question about ranges and arrays usage with timestamps... why
>> are quotes added to these?
>>
>> timestamptz (no quotes with input or output):
>> table "a": INSERT: moo[timestamptz]:2014-02-08 22:09:33+00
>>
>> tstzrange (no quotes with input, but quotes with output):
>> table "b": INSERT: moo[tstzrange]:["2014-02-08
>> 13:45:22+00","2014-02-08 14:45:42+00")
>>
>> timestamptz[] (no quotes with input, but quotes with output):
>> table "c": INSERT: moo[_timestamptz]:{"2010-01-01
>> 13:45:22+00","2010-01-03 14:45:42+00"}
>>
>> tstzrange[] (one set of quotes with input, two sets of quotes with
>> output, one set of which are escaped):
>> table "d": INSERT: moo[_tstzrange]:{"(\"2014-02-08
>> 13:45:22+00\",\"2014-02-08 13:45:42+00\"]","[\"2014-02-07
>> 10:12:19+00\",\"2014-02-07 13:51:16+00\"]"}
>
> The test_decoding output plugin just uses the default text output
> functions for all types, other plugins could do differently. I.e. in all
> these cases a SELECT, COPY, pg_dump will also include those quotes.
> E.g.
> postgres=# SELECT ARRAY[tstzrange(NOW(), NOW() + interval '1 day')];
> will format it's output similarly:
> {"[\"2014-02-08 23:44:19.82007+01\",\"2014-02-09 23:44:19.82007+01\")"}
> (1 row)
>
> Does that answer make sense?

Ah, okay. Thanks.

Another question: in order for logical decoding/replication to be
useful, presumably one would need a primary key on every table? It's
just I haven't seen this mentioned on the changeset extraction page in
the docs.

--
Thom