Re: Changeset Extraction v7.5

On 9 February 2014 01:06, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2014-02-09 00:49:31 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
>> # ALTER TABLE test ADD COLUMN a decimal DEFAULT 2.22;
>> ALTER TABLE
>>
>> # ALTER TABLE test ADD COLUMN b json DEFAULT '{"a":[1,2,3],"b":[4,5,6]}';
>> ALTER TABLE
>>
>> The output generated by those last 2 statements is:
>>
>> BEGIN 891
>> table "pg_temp_16552": INSERT: id[int4]:1 val[int4]:1 a[numeric]:2.22
>> table "pg_temp_16552": INSERT: id[int4]:2 val[int4]:2 a[numeric]:2.22
>> table "pg_temp_16552": INSERT: id[int4]:3 val[int4]:3 a[numeric]:2.22
>> COMMIT 891
>> BEGIN 892
>> table "pg_temp_16552": INSERT: id[int4]:1 val[int4]:1 a[numeric]:2.22
>> b[json]:{"a":[1,2,3],"b":[4,5,6]}
>> table "pg_temp_16552": INSERT: id[int4]:2 val[int4]:2 a[numeric]:2.22
>> b[json]:{"a":[1,2,3],"b":[4,5,6]}
>> table "pg_temp_16552": INSERT: id[int4]:3 val[int4]:3 a[numeric]:2.22
>> b[json]:{"a":[1,2,3],"b":[4,5,6]}
>> COMMIT 892
>>
>> This is showing inserts into the temp table as part of the operation.
>> Is that sufficient?
>
> I think it's a good thing for now. We don't have support for DDL
> replication so it's not yet that interesting, but having the new values
> allows to safely handle things like DEFAULTs that produce
> nondeterministic data.
> What do you think?

Okay, I'm just checking. If it's expected behaviour to you, it's good
enough for me.

--
Thom