| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Silent failure with invalid hba_file setting |
| Date: | 2011-10-24 08:13:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAA-aLv6sgfwYKzBXUtsxEkmUe9_rv4+nEGwNYySYxsB9W8Fh7A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 October 2011 05:20, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> I wouldn't add extra special checks for that. It might not be
>> completely unreasonable to have a standby that no one can connect to,
>> for example.
>
> Well, you couldn't monitor its state then, so I don't find that example
> very convincing. But if you were intent on having that, you could
> easily set up a pg_hba file containing only "reject" entries.
I hadn't noticed you'd committed some changes around this until now. Thanks.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Omar Bettin | 2011-10-24 08:57:34 | [9.1] unusable for large views |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2011-10-24 06:13:52 | Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load |