From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: FD_SETSIZE on Linux? |
Date: | 2014-09-10 07:27:47 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv60heqgTz+RkGmM71XVRbor0Dv-xcaY66cWzepz=m8stw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 September 2014 00:21, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
> > I find this in pgbench.c:
>
> > #ifdef FD_SETSIZE
> > #define MAXCLIENTS (FD_SETSIZE - 10)
> > #else
> > #define MAXCLIENTS 1024
> > #endif
>
> FD_SETSIZE is supposed to be defined, according to the POSIX spec:
>
> The <sys/select.h> header shall define the following symbolic constant,
> which shall have a value suitable for use in #if preprocessing
> directives:
>
> FD_SETSIZE
> Maximum number of file descriptors in an fd_set structure.
>
> It looks like Linux sets it to 1024. On RHEL6, at least, I find this:
>
> $ grep -r FD_SETSIZE /usr/include
> /usr/include/linux/posix_types.h:#undef __FD_SETSIZE
> /usr/include/linux/posix_types.h:#define __FD_SETSIZE 1024
> ...
> /usr/include/sys/select.h:#define FD_SETSIZE
> __FD_SETSIZE
> ...
>
Ah yes, I have the same on Debian:
/usr/include/linux/posix_types.h:#undef __FD_SETSIZE
/usr/include/linux/posix_types.h:#define __FD_SETSIZE 1024
...
usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/select.h:#define FD_SETSIZE __FD_SETSIZE
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/typesizes.h:#define __FD_SETSIZE 1024
...
I didn't think to look beyond Postgres' code.
> > #ifdef WIN32
> > #define FD_SETSIZE 1024 /* set before winsock2.h is
> included */
> > #endif /* ! WIN32 */
>
> Windows probably hasn't got sys/select.h at all, so it may not provide
> this symbol.
>
> Interestingly, it looks like POSIX also requires <sys/time.h> to define
> FD_SETSIZE. I wonder whether Windows has that header? It'd definitely
> be better to get this symbol from the system than assume 1024 will work.
>
Okay, this now makes sense. It just takes the system value and reduces it
by 10 to get the MAXCLIENTS value.
Thanks for the explanation.
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-09-10 07:57:46 | Re: replication commands and log_statements |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-09-10 06:54:06 | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction |