From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Statement timeout logging |
Date: | 2013-08-30 09:48:47 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv4vPCz7uBzkUZ65upt-r1q=9CaTU_=_KZ6MthUB8p6KFA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6 June 2013 17:28, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2013/6/6 Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When a statement is cancelled due to it running for long enough for
> > statement_timeout to take effect, it logs a message:
> >
> > ERROR: canceling statement due to statement timeout
> >
> > However, it doesn't log what the timeout was at the time of the
> > cancellation. This may be set in postgresql.conf, the database, or on
> > the role, but unless log_line_prefix is set to show the database name
> > and the user name, there's no reliable way of finding out what context
> > the configuration applied from. Setting log_duration won't help
> > either because that only logs the duration of completed queries.
> >
> > Should we output the statement_timeout value when a query is cancelled?
>
> +1
>
> we use same feature in GoodData. Our long queries are cancelled by
> users and we should to known how much a users would to wait.
>
It seems there are a couple more errors that could share this sort of
information too:
canceling authentication due to timeout
canceling statement due to lock timeout
Admittedly the first of those two isn't really an issue.
--
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-08-30 10:05:42 | Re: [v9.4] row level security |
Previous Message | Bjorn Munch | 2013-08-30 09:01:23 | Re: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions |