Re: Changeset Extraction v7.3

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.3
Date: 2014-01-28 21:48:09
Message-ID: CAA-aLv4_GxGeHWfsQTxypcHR_HYA5USCyihUbMQ5+0HBagkakw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've rebased it here and am hacking on it still.
>
> Andres and I are going back and forth between our respective git repos
> hacking on this, and I think we're getting there, but I have a
> terminological question which I'd like to submit to a wider audience:
>
> The point of Andres's patch set is to introduce a new technology
> called logical decoding; that is, the ability to get a replication
> stream that is based on changes to tuples rather than changes to
> blocks. It could also be called logical replication. In these
> patches, our existing replication is referred to as "physical"
> replication, which sounds kind of funny to me. Anyone have another
> suggestion?

Logical and Binary replication?

--
Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-01-28 21:56:20 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.3
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-01-28 21:39:43 Re: updated emacs configuration