From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Colin Taylor <colin(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: broken xlog - recovery plan check |
Date: | 2012-03-24 09:14:46 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv4B9xibz+YW0EErQaw0e5-Vci_Bj=NbtTsgEMLU9VO2UA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 24 March 2012 00:45, Colin Taylor <colin(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi I seem to have an 8.3.9 database with a broken xlog,
>
> PANIC: heap_insert_redo: invalid max offset number
>
> My plan is to run pg_resetxlog.
> Hopefully it then starts up.
> Test recent data as thoroughly as possible - (script some Select * ' s?)
> If ok -> curse ops and their raid caches
> If not -> curse ops and tell them to recover from backup (v. large and
> therefore very slow process).
>
> Can anyone give me feedback on this plan?
Yes, it's almost certainly corrupted. How old is the backup? I ask
this because if you use pg_resetxlog, it would be a good idea to dump
and restore the database once you get it up and running anyway. This
is because you can't trust that your database will be consistent. I
guess technically it *might* be fine, but you wouldn't know this
unless you went through verifying all your data made sense from a
referential integrity perspective. So it will be a trade-off between
one of:
- restore from an existing backup, losing the data since you last backed up
- doing a dump/restore after resetting xlog to ensure your database is
consistent
- running full checks once you've got your database up and running (or
ignore it and possibly find weird problems later)
Also, PostgreSQL 8.3.9 is over 2 years out of date. I'd recommend
bringing it up to 8.3.18 to take advantage of the hundreds of bug
fixes that have since gone in.
--
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alban Hertroys | 2012-03-24 10:23:08 | Re: plpgsql function to insert or update problem |
Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2012-03-24 08:44:02 | Re: group by does not show error |