Re: EXECUTE 'EXECUTE ...' or how to use dynamic prepared statements ?

From: "Marc Mamin" <M(dot)Mamin(at)intershop(dot)de>
To: "Dirk Jagdmann" <jagdmann(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXECUTE 'EXECUTE ...' or how to use dynamic prepared statements ?
Date: 2007-09-05 08:22:09
Message-ID: CA896D7906BF224F8A6D74A1B7E54AB301750B8E@JENMAIL01.ad.intershop.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hello Dirk,

I have to disagree.

Your first update query is very low. It probably implies to run the sub
select statement for each row to be updated.

Following update statement is already much faster: (using UPDATE FROM)

update test_table
set mygroup= t.mygroup
from test_table as t
where t.family = test_table.family
and t.rang = 1
and table.rang=0
-- perform the updte only when required
and mygroup <> t.mygroup;

But when you are dealing with "parent - child" relations within a
single table as in my case,
a single table scan with SELECT DISTINCT ON and a row by row comparison
on the result set appears to be faster.

I tested both approaches on tables with ca. 14'000'000 rows where 25% of
them needed to be updated.

The above update statement run in 5H30' where my function did the job in
2H.
(as my tables are very large, much time is lost in i/o wait)

Cheers,

Marc

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message roy simkes 2007-09-05 08:33:26 tsearch2 query question
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2007-09-05 08:16:34 Re: ISO time zone format