From: | "Marc Mamin" <M(dot)Mamin(at)intershop(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM... |
Date: | 2007-07-17 14:10:30 |
Message-ID: | CA896D7906BF224F8A6D74A1B7E54AB301750B12@JENMAIL01.ad.intershop.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM...
Hello,
We have the oppotunity to benchmark our application on a large server. I
have to prepare the Postgres configuration and I'd appreciate some
comments on it as I am not experienced with servers of such a scale.
Moreover the configuration should be fail-proof as I won't be able to
attend the tests.
Our application (java + perl) and Postgres will run on the same server,
whereas the application activity is low when Postgres has large
transactions to process.
There is a large gap between our current produtcion server (Linux, 4GB
RAM, 4 cpus) and the benchmark server; one of the target of this
benchmark is to verify the scalability of our application.
And you have no reason to be envious as the server doesn't belong us :-)
Thanks for your comments,
Marc Mamin
Posgres version: 8.2.1
Server Specifications:
----------------------
Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 Server:
http://www.sun.com/servers/highend/m8000/specs.xml
File system:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS
Planned configuration:
--------------------------------
# we don't expect more than 150 parallel connections,
# but I suspect a leak in our application that let some idle connections
open
max_connections=2000
ssl = off
#maximum allowed
shared_buffers= 262143
# on our current best production server with 4GB RAM (not dedicated to
Postgres), work_mem is set to 600 MB
# this limitation is probably the bottleneck for our application as the
files in pgsql_tmp grows up to 15 GB
# during large aggregations (we have a locking mechanismus to avoid
parallel processing of such transactions)
work_mem = 31457280 # (30 GB)
# index creation time is also an issue for us; the process is locking
other large processes too.
# our largest table so far is 13 GB + 11 GB indexes
maintenance_work_mem = 31457280 # (30 GB)
# more than the max number of tables +indexes expected during the
benchmark
max_fsm_relations = 100000
max_fsm_pages = 1800000
# don't know if I schoud modify this.
# seems to be sufficient on our production servers
max_stack_depth = 2MB
# vacuum will be done per hand between each test session
autovacuum = off
# required to analyse the benchmark
log_min_duration_statement = 1000
max_prepared_transaction = 100
# seems to be required to drop schema/roles containing large number of
objects
max_locks_per_transaction = 128
# I use the default for the bgwriter as I couldnt find recommendation on
those
#bgwriter_delay = 200ms # 10-10000ms between rounds
#bgwriter_lru_percent = 1.0 # 0-100% of LRU buffers
scanned/round
#bgwriter_lru_maxpages = 5 # 0-1000 buffers max
written/round
#bgwriter_all_percent = 0.333 # 0-100% of all buffers
scanned/round
#bgwriter_all_maxpages = 5 # 0-1000 buffers max
written/round
#WAL
fsync = on
#use default
#wal_sync_method
# we are using 32 on our production system
wal_buffers=64
# we didn't make any testing with this parameter until now, but this
should'nt be a relevant
# point as our performance focus is on large transactions
commit_delay = 0
#CHECKPOINT
# xlog will be on a separate disk
checkpoint_segments=256
checkpoint_timeout = 5min
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-07-17 15:06:03 | Re: Postgres configuration for 64 CPUs, 128 GB RAM... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-17 00:18:18 | Re: TRUNCATE TABLE |