Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Date: 2024-01-25 15:06:41
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaC39=6Mc=b4zGVn86r7-1YPZtYQf=fVPaKdEXrA2i0dA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:39 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> That seems like a reasonable starting point. Even if it doesn't help
> determine the root cause, it should at least help rule out concurrent
> summary removal.

Here is a patch for that.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Temporary-patch-to-help-debug-pg_walsummary-test-.patch application/octet-stream 3.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2024-01-25 15:12:58 Re: A compiling warning in jsonb_populate_record_valid
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-01-25 14:57:32 Re: A compiling warning in jsonb_populate_record_valid