Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Date: 2024-01-24 19:39:22
Message-ID: 20240124193922.GA2711912@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 02:08:08PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 1:05 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Otherwise, I think we'll probably need to add some additional logging to
>> figure out what is happening...
>
> Where, though? I suppose we could:
>
> 1. Change the server code so that it logs each WAL summary file
> removed at a log level high enough to show up in the test logs.
>
> 2. Change the TAP test so that it prints out readdir(WAL summary
> directory) at various points in the test.

That seems like a reasonable starting point. Even if it doesn't help
determine the root cause, it should at least help rule out concurrent
summary removal.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-01-24 19:40:19 Re: Remove redundant HandleWalWriterInterrupts()
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2024-01-24 19:23:39 Re: dblink query interruptibility