| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery |
| Date: | 2021-08-02 13:17:29 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYxi_f14WW6osP61DYQinrVQLyFX1F38NZWHW9xJJmgNg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 1:37 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I pushed 0001.
That's great. I just realized that this leaves us with identical
RequestCheckpoint() calls in two nearby places. Is there any reason
not to further simplify as in the attached?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Further-simplify-a-bit-of-logic-in-StartupXLOG.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amul Sul | 2021-08-02 13:40:20 | Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-08-02 13:07:18 | Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery |