Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery
Date: 2021-08-02 21:52:37
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+egXmO5GYhrhO5WgXziFeVMAE_uSVBEEBqsYh3Tid9fg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:17 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> That's great. I just realized that this leaves us with identical
> RequestCheckpoint() calls in two nearby places. Is there any reason
> not to further simplify as in the attached?

LGTM.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-08-02 21:57:18 Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-08-02 21:41:39 Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early