Re: Regression: Problems with Timestamp arguments

Please note, that a parasite line (for a missing file) had slipped
into the patch.
I apologise for that. I will remake the patch if needed.

2013/9/10 Lachezar Dobrev <l(dot)dobrev(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> I've made a blunt stab at working around the issue.
> The attached patch adds a new parameter to the JDBC URL: timestamp.
> The parameter can be wither 'with_timezone' or 'without_timezone'. If
> the parameter is missing, or has a different value then the current
> behaviour (using Oid.UNSPECIFIED) is exhibited. With the parameters
> specified correctly one of the Oid.TIMESTAMP or Oid.TIMESTAMPTZ is
> used when sending Timestamp arguments to the server.
>
> I am not sure whether this is the correct way to request new
> features/enhancements, or what is the work-flow for accepting patches,
> so feel free to scold me.
>
> I believe the patch to be backwards compatible and very
> light-weight, but it may deviate from the code formatting and code
> practices of the project.
>
>
> 2013/9/10 Lachezar Dobrev <l(dot)dobrev(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> I (believe I) understand the issue.
>> May I suggest a parameter to the Connection URL to specify how
>> Timestamp is sent to the server.
>>
>> I am not versed enough to make a patch to hold this proposal, but if
>> I must I will try to.
>>
>> How is this problem «solved» when using protocol version 2?
>> Is there a way to degrade certain parts of the protocol?