Re: Replica on low-bandwitdh network

I don't know if this is relevant, but we use the default streaming
replication and were not always keeping up. Now we WAL log ship to S3
bucket... seems to work pretty well... cheers Ben

On 5 December 2017 at 17:12, Job <Job(at)colliniconsulting(dot)it> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> we have some postgreswl 9.6.1 servers in two different continent.
> Latency is from 180 to 250 ms between the two sites.
>
> Actually we use Rubyrep for off-site replication, since servers are
> completely independent in case of connectivity loss.
>
> We are experiencing some problems with lock tables (rubyrep works with
> trigger to commit changes to the other server),
> we think for the uncommon latency.
>
> Which is, for you, the best replication module for Postgresql?
> Bucardo? Something else?
>
> Thank you, very best!
> F
>
>

--

Dr Ben Madin

m : +61 448 887 220

e : ben(at)ausvet(dot)com(dot)au

5 Shuffrey Street, Fremantle
Western Australia

on the web: www.ausvet.com.au

This transmission is for the intended addressee only and is confidential
information. If you have received this transmission in error, please delete
it and notify the sender. The contents of this email are the opinion of the
writer only and are not endorsed by Ausvet unless expressly stated
otherwise. Although Ausvet uses virus scanning software we do not accept
liability for viruses or similar in any attachments.