| From: | John Woltman <john(dot)woltman(at)tpiengineering(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis |
| Date: | 2018-06-01 17:27:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+wMe6U5QCFFTCxy_1hM=ThUpVdaWzdnQtSFAkn4ngirVCqymw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
According to "dnf info", the repo is pgdg95, which I got from the Postgres
website. Since this looks like a packaging bug and not specifically a
Postgres bug, should I submit it pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org?
-John
John Woltman
TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 06/01/2018 10:06 AM, John Woltman wrote:
>
>> I'm attempting to install PostGIS2 (specifically postgis2_95 for Postgres
>> 9.5) on Fedora 28. When I run ``sudo dnf install postgis23_95`` I get the
>> the following the error:
>>
>> Error:
>> Problem: conflicting requests
>> - nothing provides geos36 >= 3.6.2 needed by postgis23_95
>>
>> Fedora 28 provides GEOS 3.6.1. Is my issue something that I should bring
>> up to the Fedora maintainers or to whoever's in charge of the Postgres Yum
>> repos?
>>
>
> What repo source are you using for the PostGIS package?
>
>
>
>> Thank you,
>> John
>>
>> John Woltman
>> TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260
>>
>>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-06-01 17:31:46 | Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis |
| Previous Message | Guyren Howe | 2018-06-01 17:25:40 | Re: Whither 1:1? |