From: | Pascal Cloup <ptpas059(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Fwd: large objects |
Date: | 2015-06-24 13:43:34 |
Message-ID: | CA+ubD0jnHjGwR2J6hnJbkord96+EQR8Cq7y9rCrmVZWjsWNBgA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
At beginning that's what i thought, but leaving such data outside database
creates other problems: accessibility, authorization, backup,...
If postgresql supplies some methods for large objects, i suppose that it
has an adequate storage strategy, no?
I have mixed things when i spoke on OIDS (?), in fact i thought on TOAST.
regards
Pascal
2015-06-23 18:49 GMT+02:00 hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:33:52PM +0200, Pascal Cloup wrote:
> > - use the option WITH OIDS during CREATE TABLE or ALTER TABLE
>
> WITH OIDS is in no way related to storing large blobs in tables, and
> generally shouldn't be used.
>
> > Is it a good idea to store such large objects in DB? and if so, what is
> the
> > best choice?
>
> In majority of cases, I would say that, storing binary blobs in database
> is bad idea. Waste of resources. It's better store them on filesystem,
> and in DB just store path to the file.
>
> Best regards,
>
> depesz
>
> --
> The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact
> with it.
>
> http://depesz.com/
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hans Ginzel | 2015-06-29 08:47:57 | nohup psql does not read .pgpass |
Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2015-06-23 16:49:20 | Re: large objects |