Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column

From: Manuel Rigger <rigger(dot)manuel(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column
Date: 2019-07-22 20:53:20
Message-ID: CA+u7OA55uGyfLhEOUqAjyyOwsrKVuv1aeTBFdyboEiVBqrMJdg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks a lot for the fix!

Best,
Manuel

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:35 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-Jul-22, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I nearly missed the need for that because of all the noise that
> > check-world emits in pre-v12 branches. We'd discussed back-patching
> > eb9812f27 at the time, and I think now it's tested enough that doing
> > so is low risk (or at least, lower risk than the risk of not seeing
> > a failure). So I think I'll go do that now.
>
> I'd like that, as it bites me too, thanks.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2019-07-22 20:56:15 Re: make libpq documentation navigable between functions
Previous Message Nikita Glukhov 2019-07-22 20:23:22 Re: Psql patch to show access methods info