Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12

From: Mariel Cherkassky <mariel(dot)cherkassky(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Zakharov <Andrew898(at)mail(dot)ru>, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
Date: 2019-12-16 11:48:20
Message-ID: CA+t6e1mL38NgvE-_AZoXH4DzG9bJNO6zvoQhy=5M0pN_qBJ6JA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-performance

Hey Jeff,Andrew,
I continued testing the 12version vs the 96 version and it seems that there
is almost non diff and in some cases pg96 is faster than 12. I compared the
content of pg_stat_statements after each test that I have done and it seems
that the db time is almost the same and sometimes 96 is faster by 5%.

Any idea why there isnt any improvement even when I enabled the parallel
params in 12 ?
I can add a few examples if needed..

>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Zakharov 2019-12-16 12:27:01 RE: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
Previous Message Min Wang 2019-12-12 21:18:55 RE: PostgreSQL 11 sends shared secret to RADIUS server in all low case

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Zakharov 2019-12-16 12:27:01 RE: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
Previous Message Olivier Gautherot 2019-12-16 10:17:50 Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time