Re: pgstattupple vs pg_total_relation_size

From: Mariel Cherkassky <mariel(dot)cherkassky(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais" <ioguix(at)free(dot)fr>
Cc: Tumasgiu Rossini <rossini(dot)t(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgstattupple vs pg_total_relation_size
Date: 2019-01-30 14:32:01
Message-ID: CA+t6e1kac6ZAfEr74LsuiBpyMAPd-a=m=HujhyCAh+kwpF79qg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-performance

There aren't any constraint or indexes, just a regular table. I didn't see
the fsm and vm files in the base dir. Were they created immediately for
every table or after some updates/deletes ?

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019, 3:27 PM Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais <
ioguix(at)free(dot)fr wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:19:52 +0100
> Tumasgiu Rossini <rossini(dot)t(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > According to the doc [1],
> > pg_total_relation_size add toasted data *and* indexes to the mix.
>
> *and* FSM *and* VM.
>
> > Any index, unique constraint, or primary key on your table ?
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-ADMIN-DBSIZE
> >
> > Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 11:42, Mariel Cherkassky <
> > mariel(dot)cherkassky(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
> >
> > > Hey,
> > > I'm using postgresql 9.6.11. I wanted to ask something about the
> functions
> > > I mentioned in the title :
> > > I created the next table :
> > > postgres=# \d students;
> > > Table "public. students "
> > > Column | Type | Modifiers
> > > ----------+---------+-----------
> > > id| integer |
> > > name| text |
> > > age| integer |
> > > data | jsonb |
> > >
> > > I inserted one row. When I query the table`s size with
> > > pg_total_relation_size I see that the data occupies 2 pages :
> > >
> > > postgres=# select pg_total_relation_size(' students ');
> > > pg_total_relation_size
> > > ------------------------
> > > 16384
> > > (1 row)
> > >
> > > postgres=# select pg_relation_size(' students ');
> > > pg_relation_size
> > > ------------------
> > > 8192
> > > (1 row)
> > >
> > > When I used pgstattuple :
> > > postgres=# select * from pgstattuple('pg_toast.pg_toast_1187222');
> > > table_len | tuple_count | tuple_len | tuple_percent |
> dead_tuple_count |
> > > dead_tuple_len | dead_tuple_percent | free_space | free_percent
> > >
> > >
> -----------+-------------+-----------+---------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+------------+--------------
> > > 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 0 |
> > > 0 | 0 | 0 | 0
> > > (1 row)
> > >
> > > postgres=# select * from pgstattuple('students');
> > > table_len | tuple_count | tuple_len | tuple_percent |
> dead_tuple_count |
> > > dead_tuple_len | dead_tuple_percent | free_space | free_percent
> > >
> > >
> -----------+-------------+-----------+---------------+------------------+----------------+--------------------+------------+--------------
> > > 8192 | 1 | 1221 | 14.9 |
> 0 |
> > > 0 | 0 | 6936 | 84.67
> > > (1 row)
> > >
> > > Which means, the toasted table is empty and you can see that the row I
> > > inserted should occupy only one page(8K in my system).
> > >
> > > Then, why the pg_total_relation_size shows another page ?(16KB in
> total)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> Dalibo
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pepe TD Vo 2019-01-30 14:44:31 Re: ora2pg import
Previous Message Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais 2019-01-30 13:27:01 Re: pgstattupple vs pg_total_relation_size

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-01-30 14:46:49 Re: pgstattupple vs pg_total_relation_size
Previous Message Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais 2019-01-30 13:27:01 Re: pgstattupple vs pg_total_relation_size