Re: Is float8 a reference type?

From: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is float8 a reference type?
Date: 2017-09-23 17:09:08
Message-ID: CA+renyX+V86ciSE7TMmqAdxpsDCnx4Mu4_sQXEbQ8-EbOb-cUA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wonder whether you're using up-to-date Postgres headers (ones
> where Float8GetDatum is a static inline function).

I'm building against 9.6.3 on both machines. I'm not doing anything
special to change the compilation options. Here is my whole Makefile:

MODULES = floatfile
EXTENSION = floatfile
EXTENSION_VERSION = 1.0.0
DATA = floatfile--$(EXTENSION_VERSION).sql

PG_CONFIG = pg_config
PGXS := $(shell $(PG_CONFIG) --pgxs)
include $(PGXS)

But what I'm really interested in is this: What are the bad things
that can happen if I do `datums = (Datum *)floats`, as long as it's
only when Datums are 8 bytes wide? Is there a platform with
pass-by-val float8s where that won't work?

Thanks,
Paul

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jack Christensen 2017-09-23 22:10:42 Is auto-analyze as thorough as manual analyze?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-09-23 16:40:24 Re: Is float8 a reference type?