| From: | John Nash <postgres(dot)dba(dot)needs(dot)help(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Re: [PERFORM] exponential performance decrease, problem with version postgres + RHEL? |
| Date: | 2012-09-28 10:58:42 |
| Message-ID: | CA+rSYkSfyXYq0vdAPyi-j9C-rE_fD2WRpt2AN+Jb7gNnL5ZJcw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Ah ok!
Thank you very much!
As it's written:
compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.6 20110731
we thought that was the gcc version and the one written between () was
the OS version.
So, this is not a problem!
Thank you!!!!
2012/9/28 Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hi
>
> On 28 September 2012 13:43, John Nash <postgres(dot)dba(dot)needs(dot)help(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> We don't understand why in here it's written "(Red Hat 4.4.6-3)".
>
> GCC version is 4.4.6-3 on RHEL 6.2 :)
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Nikolay
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | antthelimey | 2012-09-28 13:52:30 | "Select * " on 12-18M row table from remote machine thru JDBC - Performance nose-dives after 10M-ish records |
| Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2012-09-28 10:58:12 | RE: [PERFORM] exponential performance decrease, problem with version postgres + RHEL? |