From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). |
Date: | 2018-03-02 12:44:53 |
Message-ID: | CA+q6zcWfntt2MPZYmzK71UmoWS3DFgYbYhTWU7Fgg1y9CMaOcw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 2 March 2018 at 10:33, Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> The fix you proposed isn't related with the initial report [1] by Amul
> Sul, IMHO. The patch tries to fix that behaviour and additionally tries
> to be more smart in handling and matching separator characters within
> input and format strings. And unfortunately, it partly breaks backward
> compatibility.
>
> Your propose could break backward compatibility too, I think. And in
> different manner than the patch I think. And that's why it needs another
> patch I think and needs an additional decision about breaking backward
> compatibility. All this is IMHO.
>
> 1 - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1873520224.1784572.1465833145330.JavaMail.yahoo%40mail.yahoo.com
Well, I'm not sure that it's completely unrelated, but I see your point - it
makes sense to discuss this and move forward in small steps. So, if there are
no objections I'll mark this patch as ready.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2018-03-02 12:51:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-03-02 12:43:42 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |