Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
Date: 2018-02-07 21:51:10
Message-ID: CA+q6zcVOmcmbDZnrJdxighp=95xdkGYOucabtay+CpWU8UDqkA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 6 February 2018 at 10:17, Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> It is strange. I still can apply both v9 [1] and v10 [2] via 'git
> apply'. And Patch Tester [3] says that it is applied. But maybe
> it is because of my git (git version 2.16.1).
>
> You can try also 'patch -p1':

Yes, looks like the problem is on my side, sorry.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-02-07 21:59:20 Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-02-07 21:34:02 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v10.0