From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current |
Date: | 2018-11-29 13:13:30 |
Message-ID: | CA+q6zcV64ydpeiGfkpNSoQoV06dYpB7P+F7QpzeZCENgchEpsQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:25 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here's a new version. I did some cosmetic clean-up, and I dropped the
> changes to pg_controldata output, replication epoch/xid processing
> code and various similar non-essential changes. For this patch I want
> just the new type + next xid generator + appropriate conversions.
>
> I propose that we get this committed early in the cycle. That'd
> maximise testing time in the tree, fix the bug identified by Amit, and
> leave plenty of time for later patches to use FullTransactionId in
> more places as appropriate.
Then probably it's the good time to do so. Any opinions or more reviews here?
I'll move it to the next CF for now.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-11-29 13:27:07 | Re: New GUC to sample log queries |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-11-29 13:11:11 | Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe? |