From: | Aníbal Pacheco <apacheco(dot)uy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: help with upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 |
Date: | 2012-10-25 04:39:09 |
Message-ID: | CA+pf5N+k3A4ddbcwq9ZLx7H66qEmrPCCowb2ajiY+9hGxLNemQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I could after some work, what I want to ask now is this:
In the middle of the pg_restore process I had to stop it (^Z) and remove
one problematic and not needed database from the
generated pg_upgrade_dump_db.sql file and then continue the process with
fg, of course it failed BUT: I started the new server and checked for my
only needed database and it seems to be ok, can I be sure that this
database was restored correctly? I think that is very probably that the
answer is yes because the pg_restore process probably restores the
databases in sequence like transactions, I'm right? thanks!
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Aníbal Pacheco <apacheco(dot)uy(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 but lc_collate issue is very
> difficult to solve, How I know the old lc_collate? I've only could grepped
> old settings lc_numeric, lc_time, lc_messages and lc_monetary all them =
> 'C' but I don't know what lc_collate was or how to find it. please help.
> Thanks
>
> (sorry if this message gets dupplicated, I've sent a copy just a sec
> before confirm the list membership)
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2012-10-25 06:37:16 | Re: Data sets for download |
Previous Message | Jayadevan M | 2012-10-25 03:15:47 | Data sets for download |