Re: large object max size

From: Luis Flores <luiscamposflores(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>
Cc: pramodh reddy <pramodh(dot)mereddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: large object max size
Date: 2012-10-14 08:22:00
Message-ID: CA+nXnG9wZR+240K4r41=_GEjVtcqA-8nGNxyN_o9iyQoyNOENw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

I've used 300MB objects, no problem. The only limit is java max
memory, the object load uses around 1.5 times the object size, at
least on ASCII transfers, I'm not sure if binary transfers are already
default.

Luis Flores

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 11:52 PM, pramodh reddy wrote:
>>
>> What is the maximum size of large object supported by the latest JDBC
>> driver ?
>
>
> I haven't explicitly tested, but there's no reason to expect it's any
> different from PostgreSQL's own maximums.
>
> That said, I wouldn't personally use large objects anywhere near the
> maximum. The performance won't be great, and it's a pain for backup and
> restore.
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dmp 2012-10-14 16:40:25 Re: drop in performance using jdbc driver version 9
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2012-10-14 04:33:31 Re: large object max size