| From: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Raymond <David(dot)Raymond(at)tomtom(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org" <psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CPU usage for queries, psycopg 2 vs 3 |
| Date: | 2023-09-07 12:43:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+mi_8bu20AYVJwk8H8GgcbQZc2j8=ixAFJR+bXfMA9mujGxTg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | psycopg |
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 13:17, David Raymond <David(dot)Raymond(at)tomtom(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Could you please be so kind as to repeat your tests with psycopg 3.1.4?
> Tried with 3.1.4 and it has idle processor usage while waiting for the 8 results, just like psycopg2.
> Tried with 3.1.5 and it spikes up to 62% reported CPU usage while waiting for the 8 results, just like the current release.
Thank you, this gives a good indication about where to look.
-- Daniele
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2023-09-11 15:26:21 | Re: CPU usage for queries, psycopg 2 vs 3 |
| Previous Message | David Raymond | 2023-09-07 12:17:40 | RE: CPU usage for queries, psycopg 2 vs 3 |