From: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Solving the problems with wheel packages |
Date: | 2018-01-13 21:50:16 |
Message-ID: | CA+mi_8bd6kJHLTGkuyHSnqcgDrJ1uHgQWvXCKQFD3tPQBUa2Bw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | psycopg |
Hello,
since psycopg version 2.7, together with the classic source
distribution, we have released psycopg as a wheel binary package on
PyPI [1]. This allows people to install psycopg using:
pip install psycopg2
without the usual build (Python and Postgres header files, pg_config)
and runtime (libpq) requirements.
The resulting package largely works, but it has a problem: among libpq
dependencies there is libssl, which is included in the wheel package.
But the system libssl version may also be imported for other reason by
the Python process (e.g. using 'urllib' to open an https resource).
When this happens, in concurrent situations, the process may segfault.
I don't think the situation is easily fixable: the libssl ABI is not
stable so it cannot be excluded from the wheel package. Unfortunately
the libpq calls the libssl initialisation function at every connection
(unnecessarily, AFAICS), and such function is non-reentrant; the call
is guarded by a lock, which probably doesn't guard from the concurrent
initialisation of the system libssl... or some mess like that. While
the conditions for the segfault are relatively rare, the situation of
a psycopg package unstable in combination with part of the standard
library makes me less than happy. On the other hand I'm reluctant to
throw the baby out with the bathwater: the binary packages have proven
quite handy for a number of users.
What I think is that the wheel packages should really be an opt-in
feature, but AFAIK there is no such possibility [3]. In order to make
up one, my idea is to release a new psycopg package called
'psycopg2-binary', and leave the basic psycopg2 package as source only
('psycopg2-binary' is only the name of the package on PyPI: the name
of the Python package is still 'psycopg2'). My plan for the next
releases is then:
- release psycopg 2.7.4 as a normal 2.7.x, both as source and binary packages;
- also release a package called psycopg2-binary version 2.7.4;
- importing the wheel package installed from 'pip install psycopg2'
will result in a
warning:
The psycopg2 wheel package will be renamed from release 2.8;
to keep using the binary package please install 'psycopg2-binary' instead.
- importing the wheel package installed from 'pip install
psycopg2-binary' will cause
no such warning;
- starting from release 2.8, the binary packages will only be released under
psycopg2-binary.
This way, who prefers to keep on using the binary package may change
their requirements to install 'psycopg2-binary'; who will opt to build
from source can keep on doing as documented (e.g. installing with
'--no-binary'). Until the release of psycopg 2.8 everything will keep
on working as expected, but in order to silence the warning it will be
necessary to opt in or out of the binary package; after the release
2.8 'pip install psycopg2' will build from source again.
I have already updated the build system to create the packages as
described above [4], and I have uploaded them on testpipy [5,6], so
they can be obtained using:
pip install --pre -i https://testpypi.python.org/simple psycopg2
pip install --pre -i https://testpypi.python.org/simple psycopg2-binary
I would be happy to have your feedback. Thank you very much.
-- Daniele
[1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/psycopg2
[2] https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2/issues/543
[3] https://github.com/pypa/wheel/issues/215
[4] https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2-wheels/commit/cf03a558
[5] https://testpypi.python.org/pypi/psycopg2
[6] https://testpypi.python.org/pypi/psycopg2-binary
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2018-01-14 10:59:05 | Re: Solving the problems with wheel packages |
Previous Message | Israel Brewster | 2017-12-05 19:39:08 | Re: LISTEN, select/poll question/clarification |