| From: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Fortunov <postgresql(at)danielfortunov(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Psycopg <psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Paolo De Stefani <paolo(at)paolodestefani(dot)it> |
| Subject: | Re: psycopg3 transactions |
| Date: | 2021-10-16 09:59:33 |
| Message-ID: | CA+mi_8avhGJ-JrYndoLhz=Q=7CUcFQ+MemAuOGacuZ6ckmrnkg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | psycopg |
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 23:43, Daniel Fortunov
<postgresql(at)danielfortunov(dot)com> wrote:
> One thing I didn't understand was the wording of this suggestion:
>>
>> use an autocommit connection: conn.autocommit = True, eventually as connect() parameter too;
>
>
> Is this meant to convey:
>>
>> use an autocommit connection: Set conn.autocommit = True (or you can provide this as a connect() parameter);
Yes, I will try to use some wording like that, thank you :)
-- Daniele
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2021-10-16 22:29:45 | Re: psycopg3 transactions |
| Previous Message | Daniel Fortunov | 2021-10-15 21:43:37 | Re: psycopg3 transactions |