Re: Restriction on comments

From: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: maccaroo(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Restriction on comments
Date: 2022-10-21 09:50:07
Message-ID: CA+mi_8ajOd5s6vrMSkDxY1Gw-XXvzj+-5g-RO3j+aXjdYxZMjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 09:23, PG Doc comments form
<noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-comment.html
> Description:
>
> I've recently been converting some DML which was intended for BigQuery to
> use PostgreSQL 14. Using a python client (using sqlalchemy and the
> postgresql+psycopg2 driver), I had successfully created a table and was
> trying to add comments to the columns. All of this was previously done in a
> single statement on BigQuery, but requires separate CREATE TABLE and COMMENT
> ON COLUMN statements for PostgreSQL.
>
> For one of the comment statements I received this error: "dict is not a
> sequence". It turns out the culprit was that one of the comments had a '%'
> character. I'm not familiar with restrictions on strings in PostgreSQL, but
> it would be helpful to have a list of these.

This is likely not coming from PostgreSQL. Psycopg uses `%s` as a
placeholder. As a consequence, if you want to pass a literal `%`, you
have to escape it at `%%`.

See documentation at
https://www.psycopg.org/docs/usage.html#passing-parameters-to-sql-queries

-- Daniele

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Niels Bom 2022-10-21 13:54:07 Usability ideas: text width and headers that are links
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2022-10-21 05:49:03 Restriction on comments