From: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: libpq async connection and multiple hosts |
Date: | 2023-10-25 16:58:10 |
Message-ID: | CA+mi_8ZBdOfY+MXL=qn7VKtsw7ojftBT32R6=idahr8-VJfvsA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 17:35, Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> Another approach is to use tcp_user_timeout instead of connect_timeout
> to skip non-responsive hosts. It's not completely equivalent though to
> connection_timeout though, since it also applies when the connection
> is actually being used. Also it only works on Linux afaik. It could be
> nice to add support for BSD its TCP_CONNECTIONTIMEOUT socket option.
This seems brittle and platform-dependent enough that we would surely
receive less grief by hardcoding a default two minutes timeout.
-- Daniele
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikita Malakhov | 2023-10-25 17:13:07 | Re: remaining sql/json patches |
Previous Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2023-10-25 16:54:15 | Re: libpq async connection and multiple hosts |