From: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Frank Millman <frank(at)chagford(dot)com> |
Cc: | psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Minor issue |
Date: | 2020-05-26 12:11:34 |
Message-ID: | CA+mi_8YDBvXkns7odQQ5VLATyCXe2xFTw_KV5H19Q9aTyWEEog@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | psycopg |
No, we don't want to add any intelligence in trying to figure out what
is into a query. If you are comfortable that you will be using always
the same pattern for comments you can easily clean the string yourself
before passing it to psycopg.
A better approach for you I guess would be to use named placeholders,
so that an a missing placeholder wouldn't require you to change the
arguments to execute.
-- Daniele
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 23:43, Frank Millman <frank(at)chagford(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> This is very minor, but I thought I would mention it.
>
> I have a function that returns a complex SQL query and a tuple of
> parameters. The query is stored inside the function as a triple-quoted
> string, and the parameters are derived depending on the input arguments.
>
> Sometimes while testing I will comment out some of the SQL using '--'.
> If those lines happen to contain a parameter placeholder ('%s') I
> expected to remove the parameter from the tuple as well.
>
> pyodbc and sqlite3 both work this way, but psycopg2 raises the exception
> 'tuple index out of range'.
>
> I can live with it, but it means that I have to adjust the parameter
> tuple differently depending on which database I am testing with.
>
> If it can be fixed, that would be nice. If it can't, no problem.
>
> Frank Millman
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frank Millman | 2020-05-26 12:15:29 | Re: Minor issue |
Previous Message | Frank Millman | 2020-05-26 12:00:56 | Re: Minor issue |