multi-master replication (Was: Has Pg 9.1.0 been released today?)

From: Aleksey Tsalolikhin <atsaloli(dot)tech(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: multi-master replication (Was: Has Pg 9.1.0 been released today?)
Date: 2011-09-16 00:12:09
Message-ID: CA+jMWoetGYWjuBer1Qt72H0Y7cyxKCBaGW55nNBGLUzT+JhPwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/2011 04:01 AM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
>>>
>>> Now that you have streaming replication both async and sync, are you
>>> working on multi-master replication? *excited* Or what's the
>>> roadmap?
>
> I would take a look at postgres-r. It is under active and supported
> development.

Thank you Joshua, I just took a look at Postgres-R. FAQ states "Can I
use Postgres-R in a productive environment? Not yet, sorry." I'm a
production line sys admin so I can't touch it yet. :)

I saw today "multi-master replication Simon/2nd Quadrant" in the
repost of David Wheeler's post ("What do you want to get?" or "What
features do you want?" or something like that.) Cheering erupted.

Thank you, Craig Rinder and john r pearce for your replies, as well.

Best,
Aleksey

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2011-09-16 01:31:50 Re: Apparent Problem With NULL in Restoring pg_dump
Previous Message Andy Colson 2011-09-15 23:50:43 Re: forcing table ownership