From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Maxence Ahlouche <maxence(dot)ahlouche(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Invisible PROMPT2 |
Date: | 2020-02-10 00:30:39 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLyfaPyF=-07yQKG3jsMr96HpZYUyAJmaN9SKUay3T8rg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:43 AM Maxence Ahlouche
<maxence(dot)ahlouche(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 17:09, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Good idea, but I think you need to account for "visible" (ie, if the
>> newline is inside RL_PROMPT_START_IGNORE, it shouldn't change the width).
>> It might be best to add logic inside the existing "if (visible)" instead
>> of making a new top-level case.
>
> Right, I assumed that it was safe given that only terminal control characters were invisible.
> Since the title of the terminal window can be changed as well via control characters, it's probably better not to make that assumption.
>
> I updated the patch accordingly.
Pushed. Thanks!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-02-10 00:45:49 | Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2 |
Previous Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2020-02-10 00:23:15 | RE: Internal key management system |